Andrew Dice Clay
That’s an interesting thesis Goldstein proposes in his sympathetic puff-piece on Clay: that Clay’s ridiculing of women and calling them vile names is acceptable, because they’re just the spewings of a character he’s created, evoking the Brooklyn he grew up in, and have nothing to do with the loving, tolerant, well-adjusted performer who acts that character.
Oh, really? Well, let’s see. Then nobody should mind if I, a middle-aged white ex-Protestant male, ad-lib “comedy” routines which include racial and ethnic slurs, right? After all, I’m just playing a character, evoking the casual bigotry of the border city I grew up in a half-century ago. That has nothing to do with jolly old ACLU member Jim Brodhead, who’s just an actor giving a performance.
You say that would be different from what Clay is doing? How?
JAMES E. BRODHEAD
Sherman Oaks
More to Read
The biggest entertainment stories
Get our big stories about Hollywood, film, television, music, arts, culture and more right in your inbox as soon as they publish.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.