Compromise to Clear Air
- Share via
Are we homeowners contiguous to the airport to believe that the airport’s financial “benefit” to the community nullifies our right to enjoy the use of our homes? The commission, the FAA and pilots miss our major concern: unnecessary noise.
Coexistence demands compromise by all parties. Are we homeowners expected to tolerate excessive noise, the odor of jet fuel, disruption of peace and quiet, for the economic benefit of others with no concession on their part?
Why should we allow them to benefit economically when their inconsiderate, unbridled practices cause our property values to drop and our right to enjoy our homes to evaporate?
ELLEN BUBRICK BAGELMAN, Van Nuys
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
