MUSHROOMS
- Share via
Regarding your article “Taming Wild Mushrooms,” by Russ Parsons (Food, Jan. 14): To my delight more area restaurants are serving wild mushrooms and in increasingly interesting ways. No longer are we confronted with only the commercial button mushroom ( Agaricus bisporus )--we are seeing oyster mushrooms, chanterelles, boletes, morels and even the much-prized truffle appear on restaurant menus.
However, many restaurants are listing these gems of the earth only as “wild mushrooms” with no thought of a proper identification. While there are a few restaurants that take time to learn about what mushrooms they are about to recommend (Michael’s in Santa Monica, for one), most do not. Imagine, for example, being handed a menu that lists “fresh fish,” and when you ask what fish it is, you are offhandedly told, “It’s from the ocean,” but not whether it’s shark or salmon.
Recently, I went to a Polish restaurant that features wild mushrooms. I was looking forward to this as Poland is a large consumer of wild mushrooms and I figured that there I would find an authentic mushroom dining experience. Much to my surprise, when I asked what mushrooms were being served, I was told that they were “from the forest.” When I persisted, I was told that they were wild and I probably wouldn’t know them. Now, as an avid mycophagist and as a past president of the Los Angeles Mycological Society, I felt challenged, but not wanting to disrupt an anniversary dinner I simply ordered an entree that featured “wild mushrooms.” When my dish arrived, I saw no wild mushrooms at all--only commercial button mushrooms. I checked the plates of the others in my party and noted that even though they also had ordered dishes with wild mushrooms, none existed. I guess you could say that the moral of this is know thy morel.
DONALD A. FEINSTEIN
Venice
More to Read
Eat your way across L.A.
Get our weekly Tasting Notes newsletter for reviews, news and more.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.