The State - News from Sept. 27, 1989
- Share via
Contending that his clients want a “level playing field,” a lawyer representing seven white San Francisco police officers filed a “reverse discrimination” suit to obtain “a colorblind and sex-blind opportunity to advance.” In the Superior Court complaint, attorney Robert E. Gyemant claimed that less-qualified minority officers have been promoted in order to meet “racial quotas” set a decade ago by a court-ordered affirmative action plan. The suit contended that California has violated state civil rights laws forbidding the use of race or sex as a basis in hiring and promotion. City Atty. Louise Renne said the suit is “plowing old ground.” The suit may be the first test case for a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that reversed 20 years of affirmative action gains. That decision permitted a legal challenge to a court-ordered affirmative action plan, or consent decree, which previously could not be challenged in court.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.