Investor Bound to Arbitration, State Court Rules
A state appellate court has ruled that an arbitrator will determine a dispute between a Merrill Lynch brokerage house and a customer who legally challenged a form that new clients are asked to sign.
Paul Thompson of Garden Grove said he did not realize that a form he signed when he opened an account with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith required that disputes be sent to an arbitrator.
Thompson invested his life savings of $55,000 with the firm’s office in Orange two years ago, his lawyer, Michael A. Oswald, said.
His money had been mishandled, Thompson alleged. He filed a lawsuit in Orange County Superior Court, alleging fraud.
The brokerage firm tried to force Thompson into arbitration, but a Superior Court judge ruled that he could pursue his lawsuit. The 4th District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana ruled for Merrill Lynch on Tuesday.
More to Read
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.