Suspension of Doonesbury
- Share via
How dare The Times take it upon itself to act as the “literary-guardian-angel” of its readers!
The deliberate “killing of Doonesbury” for one week because The Times feels it to be its “responsibility to guard against publishing damaging material . . .” that the editors “. . . know to be overdrawn . . . unfair . . . and grossly exaggerates the real and alleged transgressions of many Reagan Administration appointees . . .” is an insult to the intelligence of Times readers.
Feel free to “tell it like it happens,” I can take it. Just don’t mess with my cartoons! That infuriates me and I write irate letters to editors!
DERVA SNIDER
San Juan Capistrano
Sign up for our Book Club newsletter
Get the latest news, events and more from the Los Angeles Times Book Club, and help us get L.A. reading and talking.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
