That’s Debatable

I am unwilling to support more troops for this conflict without more clarity as to what outcomes are possible and expected.

As difficult as the Iraq conflict has been, the situation in Afghanistan is much more complicated as a result of the inhospitable terrain, the history of the area, and the instability in northern portions and border regions of neighboring Pakistan.

I have some major questions, including what the Obama administration visualizes as the desired outcome of an increased U.S. presence.

Are they pursuing a strategy of “win and withdraw,” or is this indicative of semi-permanent American involvement to keep the Taliban disrupted?

Precipitous withdrawal is not a good idea, and would ultimately prove to be destabilizing, but we need to know more about where this conflict is headed before we commit further troops and treasure.

It is important to remain cognizant that Pakistan, and its already weak government, controls nuclear weapons.

Consequently, it is imperative that any action taken by the United States does not serve to further destabilize the region or serve to make existing problems worse.

Rep. John Campbell

(R-Newport Beach)

Our strategy should not be based on sending more troops.

It should be focused on supporting the anti-Taliban Afghans so they can do their own fighting.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher

(R-Huntington Beach)