High-priced hotel and eatery will diminish quality...
High-priced hotel and eatery will diminish quality of life
I can’t believe what I am reading from Marinapark resort developer
Stephen Sutherland of the hotel that might be built on Marina Park
property.
Take his hotel off public lands. The land is the only remaining
parcel owned by the city where a park can be placed. The zoning is
for a park and open space and includes a small boat-launch ramp and
dinghy storage for the mooring lessees.
Look up and down the coast at other harbors where the cities are
actively creating open park space along the water’s edge and
redesigning marinas to better accommodate the boats.
The city of Newport Beach is looking to basically give away our
park space as it did for the Balboa Bay Club. Just try to access the
bay beaches at the Bay Club. The city should not always grab for the
dollars, or we will begin to be another Marina Del Rey, with
high-rises surrounding our bay-front.
Quality of life would benefit from a park and boat ramp, whereas
quality of life will diminish from a high-priced hotel and restaurant
that most of us locals will never step foot in.
DAVE BECKNER
Newport Beach
Be skeptical of city’s motives, and vote no on Measure L
The more I read about the proposed luxury hotel/timeshare for
Marinapark, the more convinced I become that the scheme is no more
than a stalking horse for some other and yet undisclosed plan
concocted by the city.
Although the current mobile home park should return close to
$900,000 a year, based on current leases, Newport Beach seems ready
to abandon one of its few affordable-housing developments for what
may or may not be additional revenue. This could be the proposed
resort or some other “marine commercial” project on what is one of
Newport Beach’s last remaining public and accessible bayside
properties.
Granted that the developer has spread a lot of money around for
consultants, push polls, planners and made a number of expensive
promises to the city, the American Legion, the Girl Scouts and
goodness knows who else. Yet the details of his lease have yet to be
worked out, according to the Sept. 7 edition of the Daily Pilot
(“Marinapark project battle goes public”).
And according to presentations made at public hearings over the
past months, there are several more hurdles, hoops and approvals the
resort project has yet to negotiate should voters approve Measure L.
Not the least of these, I believe, are the State Lands Commission
(appropriate tidelands use) as well as the state Coastal Commission.
So what happens if this pie-in-the-sky resort development project
falls through? The city then has its zoning changed from “recreation”
to “marine commercial” and can presumably do as it pleases without a
public vote. Vote no on Measure L.
JOHN DOWDEN
Newport Beach
People from all over Newport would use a park on peninsula
With reference to the Community Commentary of Sept. 3, James
“Buzz” Person questions who would come to a public park at
Marinapark, if the public votes “No” on Measure L in November and the
site retains its recreation and environmental open-space designation,
and the timeshare hotel is voted down.
I will venture a guess who will use Marinapark if a true park is
created there with bay front, sandy beach, lawn, picnic facilities,
public small-boat facilities, plenty of parking and a view from
Balboa Boulevard to act as a “Window to the Bay.” Such a park would
extend from the American Legion to 18th Street and would also include
tennis courts, half-court basketball, a Girl Scout house and
community center.
The people visiting Marinapark would come from all over Newport
Beach who don’t live on the peninsula and have a hard time getting
there because of lack of parking and because there are no accessible
public parks on the bay front currently. People like me and my family
from Newport Heights. People from Newport Shores. People from
Westcliff. People from Corona del Mar and Eastbluff. People from
Newport Coast. In short, all people from Newport Beach who don’t live
on the peninsula.
Marinapark is the last chance people from the rest of the city
will have for a public park on the peninsula. Let’s not allow only a
few out-of-town visitors to enjoy this park site. Vote No on Measure
L so that everyone from Newport will have a chance for a decent
public park at Marinapark.
JAN D. VANDERSLOOT
Newport Beach
No such thing as a free lunch, so why even consider resort?
Stephen Sutherland, potential developer of the Marinapark resort,
would have Newport Beach residents believe he is not trying to take
their land. The property tax base levied on the homes paid for by the
residents has created a city with large revenues. The only question
is why our council would allow private infringement on our last piece
of open bay-front property. This is a valuable community asset.
Hasn’t anyone noticed that our beach areas are heavily used? Hasn’t
anyone wondered what future population growth will do to our limited
recreational areas? The people of this community need to speak out
against conversion of public property for private profit.
Let the developers buy their own land without using taxpayers’
property and denying us an amenity that we are entitled to use in our
pursuit of happiness. No amount that developers spend can change
these facts. If there is no such thing as a free lunch, why should we
even consider a free park? I hope you will join me in voting no on
Measure L and preserving this park for the use of the residents and
guests of Newport Beach.
FREDERICK RAWLINS
Newport Beach
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.