Just enforce the parking laws we have...
Just enforce the parking laws we have
When I moved to Huntington Beach in 1975 we had parking control
patrolling our neighborhoods on a regular basis. If you left your
vehicle or RV parked in the same place longer than 72 hours you were
ticketed. If you were parked on the wrong side of the street you were
ticketed. If you parked a boat in front of your house, not attached
to a vehicle, you were ticketed. Our streets were free of RVs. If the
city would enforce what is in place now there would be no reason to
change what we have. The laws are only as good as the enforcement.
The RVs are not only eyesores, they are a danger. My wife and I,
while backing out of our garage, have almost been hit, several times,
due to limited visibility from RVs being parked on the residential
streets.
H. FULLBRIGHT
Huntington Beach
City should lead itself away from new law
Just once I would like to see the city of Huntington Beach in
accord on any one subject. Why the constant bickering?
Take the proposed RV ordinance the police chief is proposing. Why
is his staff writing ordinances? The present ordinance has been in
effect since 1975 and was passed only after the city staff, not the
police department, and a resident committee worked for six months to
enact an ordinance that was amenable to both the RV owners and city
staff.
The City Council in those days acted like elected representatives
of the people and would not accept for consideration any ordinance
their constituents did not want. Why the change of council attitude?
Wouldn’t a sworn officer, in an amateur way, trying to write an
ordinance, be in a better position in the field enforcing our 1975
ordinance that until now has proven effective? Why is it now
unenforceable when it has been successfully enforced for 29 years? Is
it because our police have changed their attitude and believe it is
easier to write ordinances than to give citations in the field? Or do
we have a small group of scofflaws that the police are afraid to
tackle?
In any case I believe our elected representatives should take the
side of their constituents and put our city’s ordinance changes, if
needed, in the right hands -- our city staff members’.
The police chief says enforcing the current ordinance is
difficult. Certainly, all laws are difficult to enforce if not
approached professionally with experienced personnel. Our new police
chief should take action to put our sworn officers in the field, not
behind a desk. Since taking his position he has proven that the
negative attitude of his predecessors were unfounded. We all wish him
well and, I am sure, the majority is gratified by his selection. I
hope he does not let leftover vendettas of the police officers’
association deter him from his initial goals of better communication
with his department and those they are sworn to protect and serve.
As for other influential groups: I wish they would show the same
protective action toward their fellow constituents(who enjoy the
outdoors as much as they and the birds do) as the RV owners. Our city
has not copied the mistakes of our surrounding cities in the past.
Their oppressive ordinances do not deserve emulating. We want our
city to be a leader, not a follower. Eliminating freedoms is not a
trait of a leader.
BOB POLKOW
Huntington Beach
Parking change is about dollars
First, we had a street sweeper program: Sweepers that travel 20
mph and do little to clean the gutters but raise revenue in the form
of parking tickets. Every time an event comes to town, the parking
structures increase their rates to raise revenue, gouging the public
because of limited parking. And now, to get into our pockets again,
they want to create an RV parking fee. The common denominator in all
three: raise revenue.
Really now, 10 complaints a day for RV parking? How many does the
city get for barking dogs, loud parties, motorized scooters and
skateboards? Are they next? We do have the cleanest air, should we
have a fee for that too?
TOM SIMPSON
Huntington Beach
Why did city pay for complex up front?
I just read the front page article “City tries to save part two of
sports complex” (July 29). The article states that the project was
abandoned by contractor Joe O’conner, who has a history of failed
sports projects. (Two named in 1998). Now I have just two questions.
Why would you hire someone one with this track record? and why would
you pay them before the project was complete? The Huntington Beach
taxpayers who paid for this, deserve answers.
ADRIENNE SANDUSKY
Huntington Beach
Bolsa development has strong red light
I am responding the your question on the Dave Brooks story “Fight
Over Bolsa Chica Mesa not over.” I live on Los Patos Avenue, the
street that would be most affected by the proposed development on the
upper Mesa. I have to ask why would the California Coastal Commission
hire, train and pay a professional staff, if members overrule their
recommendations? They clearly state that the proposed development
does not conform with state law. That would provide a strong cause of
action in any lawsuit brought against a decision to go against the
commission staff report.
Hopefully commission members, at the meeting today, will follow
their own staff’s advice and end this issue. Not mentioned in Dave
Brooks article, but very relevant, is the fact that the
Newport-Inglewood earthquake fault runs near the proposed
development. I believe this makes any building in the area dangerous
and unsafe.
Can we put an end to this long-running battle, or do we have to go
back to court and continue to fight this ill-advised scheme to
destroy one of the last remaining open spaces in the area?
RAY SHERRARD
Huntington Beach
Slope talk totally off balance
It has come to my attention that they city of Huntington Beach is
considering excluding the use and development of properties that
include a slope.
I live in Huntington Harbour, off water, and my property has a
slope. On my slope I have stairs, fruit trees, flowers, and a
cantilevered deck. I am absolutely stunned and shocked that the city
could create an ordinance that would remove prospective development
and/or use of my slope. My slope is part of my yard, part of our
property. Not only do we pay for all maintenance on our slope, we
also pay property tax on that part of our land.
If the officials in Huntington Beach actually represent the
people, then that includes me. I own property with a slope. How many
of you officials actually own property with a slope? I am sure if
even one of you do, you would not be in favor of removing your rights
to your own property.
It angers me that city leaders don’t have more important issues to
deal with in our city. It shocks me that they would even consider
this motion. If they represent me, with their own personal motives
removed, they will not pass this slope zoning change.
WENDY SAWYER
Huntington Beach
Review shed light on good movies
I would like to thank Allen MacDonald for his July 22 review of
“Before Sunset,” otherwise, I would not even have known the movie was
out, what with its limited distribution.
I eventually saw it at the Long Beach Art Theater on Fourth and
Cherry. For that matter, I did not even remember the name of the
first movie -- “Before Sunrise,” but after reading the first part of
his review, figured it out from his description.
I saw the first movie about two years ago on Showtime one Saturday
afternoon, quite by accident, when channel surfing. What caught my
interest was the basic concept of the movie -- an American traveling
through Europe.
Having lived in England for seven years, and traveled extensively
through most of Europe, I always found it interesting the way
Americans interact with Europeans and vice versa, since I experienced
this first hand.
What I liked about both movies is the excellent dialogue where
both stars discuss all sorts of philosophies of life set against the
gorgeous, European background, the character Ethan Hawke plays, an
unflappable American that, no matter how much is thrown his way,
remains calm, irreverent and humorous.
As for the latest movie, “Before Sunset,” maybe it is because I am
delving into screenwriting on the side, attending a CBS studios
working group monthly, that I found the format innovative and
interesting -- a real time movie, the 70 minutes of the movie
encompassing 70 minutes of movie time; one sure saw a lot of Paris in
the distance two people could walk in 70 minutes and the characters
sure got caught up with one another after a nine-year hiatus in such
a short period of time.
As for how the movie ends, does boy meet girl? I go to the last
two lines:
CELINE
You’re going to miss your flight.
JESSE
I know.
Thanks again for your review, Allen. Your review of both movies
was spot on.
JIM BEELER
Huntington Beach
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.