Council holds off raising fees for parking
- Share via
Barbara Diamond
Once burned, twice cautious.
The City Council declined at the March 2 meeting to act on
recommended changes in the city’s parking policies until the Chamber
of Commerce weighed in on proposed fee increases in lots with
dispensers.
“I will only agree if the chamber agrees,” Mayor Cheryl Kinsman
said.
The council did not want a repeat of the debacle last year when it
raised meter rates to $1.50 an hour and then acceded to irate chamber
demands to restore the original $1 per hour fee. This time, the
council wanted the chamber to comment before it takes action.
Residents’ opinions were not specifically solicited although they
will be affected by some of the proposed changes.
Chamber representative Dennis Meyers promised specific comments at
the April 6 council meeting.
“We are not opposed, but we think the timing is off,” Meyers said.
Residents who have parking stickers won’t be affected by the
increase in parking lot meter fees, but the proposal also includes an
increase in fees for shopper permits and a possible limit of two
permits per household to stop permit-bootlegging.
“Going from two permits to four permits per family has resulted in
resales of permits to people who don’t live here,” City Manager Ken
Frank said. “We hope to get the technology that would prove vehicle
ownership. If that doesn’t work, we will recommend eliminating the
third and fourth permits.”
Shopper permits now cost $30 a year, restricted to residents.
Frank is recommending an increase to $40 a year, effective Aug. 1.
Do the math. Even with the increase, anyone who parks at a meter
for more than 40 hours a year -- less than one hour a week -- is
ahead of the game.
Other recommendations include an increase in nonresident parking
permits from $45 to $60 a year and an increase in business parking
permits from $180 to $245, both effective Aug. 1.
Frank’s recommendation to start enforcement of meters at 7 a.m.
appeared doomed.
“Seven a.m. is draconian,” Roger von Butow said. “I don’t know who
thought this up, but he doesn’t understand how the Downtown is used.”
Councilman Wayne Baglin concurred.
“We have commuters stopping for coffee,” Baglin said. “I don’t
want them being ticketed. I think we should stay at 8 a.m.”
At one time, enforcement didn’t begin until 10 a.m., a product of
a chamber program called “Our Town Till Ten.”
All four council members at the meeting -- Councilman Steven
Dicterow was absent -- opposed Frank’s recommendation to relocate
some city employee parking to free up space in the Lumberyard Parking
Lot, which is completely booked.
“The post office parking area has also been reduced,” resident
Bruce Hopping said. “I always thought that was public parking, but
it’s not. It’s a shame the spaces have been taken away.”
Frank also recommended replacing individual meters in the
Glenneyre Street parking structure with ticket machines, to be
included in the 2004-05 budget.
Alternative methods of payment were discussed.
“If the chamber agrees, I would like to see all meters [converted]
to credit cards or solar,” Kinsman said. “I also would like to look
at variable parking rates, with beach meters higher in the summer.”
Credit cards are not feasible, but a kind of debit card, called a
smart card, is.
“Debit cards are probably the next step,” Frank said. “Monterey is
using them. I think Berkeley is. We’d need a place to sell them.”
The cards are more like calling cards than bank debit cards,
purchased for a set amount, with fees subtracted.
Some of the proposed changes in parking meter, parking lot and
parking permit policies, which will be discussed next at the April 6
council meeting, will require changes in the city code.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.