November is not that far off anymore
Geoff West
With just about three quarters of a year to go until the November
elections, it’s not too early to begin thinking about what this
particular election will mean to Costa Mesa. Since this fall’s
elections will provide us an opportunity to elect a new majority on
our City Council, it’s also not too early to think about the issues
and to begin considering the possible candidates -- and begin to size
them up.
So, what are the issues that will face this city for the next
decade -- the likely time period in which those three newly elected
council persons will exercise influence over the course of our
community?
Well, right at the top has to be -- or perhaps I should say,
continues to be -- the future of the Westside. For years, this has
been the topic of study after study, and except for some superficial
but necessary infrastructure improvements in a small portion of that
area, there has been no real plan developed.
Critical to the future of this part of our town must be the
burgeoning Spanish-speaking population. At the time of our last
elections, it was estimated by some that this demographic group
represented a large segment of the Westside population, yet I have
seen no plan put forward that includes even an acknowledgment of
their existence. It has been obvious for some time that there are
those in our city with a solution to that situation: the ejection of
this particular demographic group from the city’s borders. They would
accomplish this by shutting down portions of the support system
available to them -- the Job Center and charities, for example -- in
hopes that such action would discourage them from settling in our
city. I don’t know if this is reasonable or realistic, but I do know
that it sure doesn’t feel right.
High on the list of priorities in our city must be the exercise of
some foresight and vision when it comes to development. Since we are
virtually out of large parcels of land, future development will
likely come piecemeal, a few lots at a time. We need leaders in place
who will ensure, through well-conceived, consistent land use policies
and adherence to local codes, that our city doesn’t become a
hodgepodge of strip malls and soon-to-be ghettos. Our policies should
be developer-friendly and yet not give away the store simply for the
sake of development. We literally cannot afford another 1901 Newport
Plaza debacle.
There are many other issues facing our city as the clock continues
to tick away. The ones listed above and others will require strong,
dedicated, competent leaders in our community. We now have the
opportunity to lure the right group of candidates to the ballot --
those with the intellect, energy and foresight to manage the city’s
affairs for the next decade. We cannot afford to elect those with a
narrow focus, seeking to serve only a small, but vocal, segment of
the population of this city. We must recognize past mistakes and not
make them again. Recent history has shown us that simple tenacity
alone does not prepare a candidate for public office. An elected
official must be ready, willing and able to make the personal
sacrifices necessary -- and do the homework required -- to provide
leadership in this town.
As the candidates begin to surface this year we need to do our
best to educate ourselves about them. We need to pay attention to not
only their words, but their actions. This is even more important than
in previous years because each elected council member now has
virtually carte blanche when it comes to appointing members to the
Planning and Parks and Recreation commissions. As a result, we elect
not only three council people, but six commissioners, too. This
potential new super-power base could change this community forever.
The system has become much less forgiving than in years past, when
the inadvertent election of an incompetent, misguided or lazy council
person could be “managed” by the rest of the council. If we make a
mistake this time around, we all will pay the price -- perhaps very
painfully.
We cannot afford to elect well-intentioned but ill-prepared people
this time around. We cannot afford to elect people more concerned
with the frills and ceremonial aspects of public office than the nuts
and bolts of actually getting things done. The issues facing this
city will require leaders of strong character, limitless energy,
intellectual maturity and very broad shoulders, as we ask them to
grab the helm for our trip into the vast unknown of our future. Some
of those candidates might plan to use a position on our City Council
as a stepping stone to higher office. To that I say, “Good for them!”
I would much prefer an energized, competent candidate who is looking
forward than one who is unrealistically trying to return this city to
the days of Goat Hill.
As we consider the potential candidates this year, we must ask
ourselves, “What brings each of them to the table?” Is it a single
issue that propelled them into action? Is it a true desire to provide
public service to all the citizens of this city? Or, perhaps, is
there a hidden agenda lurking behind the curtain until after the
election is over? This is an uncomfortable question, but one that
does exist in our city. Perhaps we will find a way to pull that
curtain back a little in months to come, so we all can see the real
“wizard” behind them.
So, fellow citizens of Costa Mesa, we launch ourselves once again
into the wonderful world of local politics. This is a leap year, but
I encourage all of you to look before you leap when you enter the
voting booth this fall. Much depends on your decision.
* GEOFF WEST is a Costa Mesa resident.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.