Locals want habitats for locals
- Share via
Deirdre Newman
Some residents say they want the city to stop providing land at a
cheap price to Habitat for Humanity unless Costa Mesa residents are
selected to move into the houses.
Habitat for Humanity is a nonprofit Christian housing ministry
that builds and sells affordable houses and loans money for the
mortgages to low-income families. The main criteria, which varies
with family size, is that qualifying families can only earn between
25% to 50% of the Orange County median income.
The organization has built 11 houses in the city. No families from
Costa Mesa have been selected to purchase these houses.
The disgruntled residents, including Martin Millard and Mike
Berry, say they appreciate Habitat for Humanity’s effort to provide
affordable housing, but the city has its fair share of low-income
residents who could benefit from Habitat for Humanity projects. They
would like the city to slap a condition on Habitat for Humanity
mandating that its houses in Costa Mesa go to Costa Mesa residents.
“I’m perfectly willing to say to the people of San Clemente,
Garden Grove and Santa Ana [that] if they need homes, those cities
should build it for them -- not us, when we have enough needs of our
own,” Berry said.
While sympathetic to these concerns, there’s just one problem with
Costa Mesa residents’ plan: it’s illegal, said Pete Major, executive
director of Habitat for Humanity Orange County.
“We are bound by the rules and regulations that we have and the
money we are spending,” Major said. “And as a lender, we can’t
discriminate,” Major said.
In addition to meeting income requirements, families have to have
some credit experience and be U.S. citizens. They also have to be
capable of making the down payment and closing costs for their homes.
Once Habitat for Humanity has chosen families to move into its
houses, family members have to put in 500 hours of construction work
on their house and take classes on how to budget their money, Major
said.
Habitat for Humanity has built houses at four sites in the city:
four single-family homes at two locations on Del Mar Avenue, six
houses on Pomona Street and a single-family home on Wallace Avenue,
City Manager Allan Roeder said.
Most of these projects have been on land the city owns. In these
cases, the city underwrites the cost of the land so Habitat for
Humanity can build affordable housing. This is achieved by using a
combination of redevelopment agency and federal funds that are
required to be used for affordable housing, Roeder said.
“We’re not giving free land away or using local tax dollars to
offset the cost of the property,” Roeder said.
In the case of the Pomona Street project, the city did not own the
land. The property owner was interested in selling the swath, which
was being occupied by renters, and Habitat approached the city about
partnering with it to buy the land, Roeder said. Habitat for Humanity
therefore had to take care of relocating the tenants and other
responsibilities that come with displacing tenants.
The city loaned Habitat for Humanity $621,000 for the Pomona
project. One-sixth of the loan will be forgiven as each of the six
home buyers enters into escrow. A majority of these funds were part a
pot of affordable housing money that the city was at risk of losing
at the time the loan was given.
Millard said that if the city is going to facilitate Habitat for
Humanity’s effort to build houses here, Costa Mesa residents should
be given priority.
“If we’re going to do a sweetheart condition, they should go to
people who live in the city,” Millard said. “Costa Mesa is doing more
than its fair share. We pick up the slack for cities like Newport
Beach, Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. They’re dumping their
social problems in our backyard. That’s got to be spread out a little
bit.”
Berry accused the city of doing a double disservice to its own
citizens -- taking land away from projects that could benefit Costa
Mesa residents by letting Habitat for Humanity build on it and taking
money that could be used on Costa Mesa residents and loaning it to
the organization instead.
For example, the city could have used the money it loaned to
Habitat for Humanity for the Pomona Street project to help the senior
citizens who are being evicted from the El Nido and Snug Harbor
trailer parks, Berry said.
Habitat for Humanity checked the qualifications of the six
families living on the Pomona property to see if they could stay and
become Habitat homeowners, Major said, and none qualified.
While no Costa Mesa families have moved into Costa Mesa Habitat
for Humanity houses, at least two Costa Mesa families have moved into
Habitat for Humanity houses in other cities, Major said.
The desire to own a piece of the American dream typically
supercedes where that dream materializes, Major said.
“There’s a reason why we call home ownership the American dream,”
Major said. “And to take hope away from people just because they live
across the street [in another city], I don’t think is very American.”
Major said the only means Habitat for Humanity could employ to
increase the odds of Costa Mesa residents qualifying is a more
intensive marketing campaign letting residents know about the
opportunity.
Habitat for Humanity is contemplating another Costa Mesa project
behind the Home Depot on Harbor Boulevard, Major said.
Councilman Allan Mansoor said he agrees with those who have
complained about Habitat for Humanity projects benefiting residents
from other cities.
“In my opinion, the priority should go to Costa Mesa residents,”
Mansoor said. “It’s Costa Mesa’s money that’s being loaned.”
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.