Grass-roots efforts win seat
- Share via
Lolita Harper
A remarkable election resulted in a classic City Council
Cinderella story Tuesday.
Allan Mansoor, who had never run for office or held an elected
position, unseated seasoned Mayor Linda Dixon, gathering 502 more
votes than the incumbent to win a seat with 6,965 votes, compared to
Dixon’s 6,463. Mansoor will join Councilman Gary Monahan, who was the
top vote-getter with 9,805, or 31%, on the dais in December.
Mansoor and Dixon garnered 22% and 20%, respectively, final
election results showed Wednesday.
“It was like David and Goliath,” Mansoor said Wednesday. “I was
the outsider and a longshot yet I won over the incumbent mayor. I
attribute it to all the grass-roots support.”
That grass-roots support was provided by dozens of volunteers who
labeled themselves “improvers” and helped Mansoor crusade. He raised
the least money of the five candidates, but the priceless manpower
fueled his campaign. Many of those who campaigned on behalf of
Mansoor were those responsible for Councilman Chris Steel’s decisive
win in 2000.
Eric Bever, a Westside resident, was one of the many who took to
the streets to helped both Steel and Mansoor get elected. He walked
precincts, helped deliver mailers, put up signs and spread the word.
“We did it again,” Bever said of he and his fellow improvers. “And
we’ll do it again if we have to. It’s not just the Westside anymore.
People all over the city want a change, and we are making sure we get
heard.”
Janice Davidson worked alongside Bever in both campaigns and said
the activists have once again proven they are a force to be reckoned
with.
“And we are getting stronger,” Davidson added.
Mansoor, who at one point in the campaign lost his voice from
talking so much, said he learned a lot about the political scene
during his weeks of running.
Although he had been a consistent voice at City Council meetings,
Mansoor said he hadn’t an inkling of the effort involved in active
campaigning and admitted to feeling a bit overwhelmed at times.
“I made the commitment to campaign and I refused to back down,”
Mansoor said. “Even up until the Sunday before elections, I was out
knocking on doors.”
Mansoor, who also sits on the city’s Human Relations Committee,
was the target of earlier attacks this year by members of a local gay
and lesbian organization who called him homophobic and intolerant.
The campaign trail provided more hurdles, as other candidates raised
double, triple and even quadruple amounts of political funds.
“I feel vindicated by this win,” Mansoor said. “Considering all
that Human Relations Committee baloney and those people who tried to
send me packing, I feel really vindicated. I’m still here, and they
are going to have to try much harder next time.”
Dixon, who touted a 20-year laundry list of community service
titles on her resume, bowed out of the public arena graciously
Wednesday, saying the voters had obviously made their decision.
“The community has spoken, and if that’s the direction they want
to go in, I wish them the best of luck,” Dixon said.
Dixon blames her defeat on a combination of poor voter turnout, a
diluted pool of candidates and unprincipled campaign strategies. The
mayor contends that most Costa Mesa residents were content and
therefore had no deep-seeded desire to run to the polls.
Dixon also said a bid for council by Planning Commission
Chairwoman Katrina Foley hurt her campaign by splitting many of the
same votes.
She also pointed the finger at unscrupulous strategies by Mansoor
and his camp, including bullet voting -- which is when people cast
only one of their two allowed votes so as to not give any other
candidates a boost.
“At least I know I lost honestly,” Dixon said.
Foley, who came in fourth place with 16%, echoed Dixon’s
sentiments Wednesday.
“I think we ran a very positive and on-the-issues campaign, and I
am very proud of it,” said Foley, who was the target of at least one
contentious political ploy.
Foley said it is difficult to analyze voters’ intentions so soon
after the election and with such a strong slate of viable candidates,
but she doesn’t think her bid for a seat on the dais affected the
results.
“Gary Monahan and Allan Mansoor had a steady lead throughout the
evening,” said Foley, who received 5,156 votes. “It was an obvious
mandate by those voters that they wanted Gary and Allan. If I didn’t
run, I don’t think it would have been any different.”
Foley faces an even more sobering reality than just loosing the
council election. Her term on the Planning Commission is up in March,
she said. She will need a council majority to get reappointed.
“I really enjoy that position and would like to keep it,” Foley
said.
Her chances may be slim considering the policy differences between
her and Steel and Mansoor, not to mention the political bad blood
that was shed between her and Monahan in the election.
Nobody was surprised by Monahan’s triumphant return to the dais.
He held an overwhelming lead all night and gathered 2,894 more votes
than anyone.
Planning Commissioner Bill Perkins, who was taken under Monahan’s
wing during the campaign, failed to garner the overflow votes from
the numerous Monahan supporters as he had planned.
Monahan shared money, mailers and political expertise with Perkins
throughout the campaign to get him elected to the second seat.
Perkins, who was trying for the second time to get a seat on the
council, garnered less than a third of Monahan’s total votes and
tallied the lowest totals of the evening with 10%, or 3,263 votes. He
finished last in his first council election, as well.
“I didn’t expect to come in last place again and I definitely
didn’t expect Mansoor to win,” Perkins said.
Perkins, whose Planning Commission term is also up in March, said
Mansoor’s dedicated followers and split voting were responsible for
the results. He, Monahan and Mansoor were forced to share the
conservative vote, Perkins said.
“I knew we were going to split some votes, and that’s exactly what
happened,” Perkins said. “Allan came out the victor.”
* LOLITA HARPER covers Costa Mesa. She may be reached at (949)
574-4275 or by e-mail at [email protected].
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.