1901 Newport nightclub plan on hold
Lolita Harper
Developers danced around a looming denial of a nightclub proposal
Monday as they agreed to work with neighboring businesses and
residents to come up with a plan that may garner a Planning
Commission endorsement.
Planning commissioners voted 4 to 1 to postpone a decision on the
nightclub to allow developer Hunsaker and Associates and nightclub
owner James Raven a chance to devise a plan that incorporated more
input from neighboring businesses and residences and a detailed
parking plan.
Planning Commissioner and City Council candidate Bill Perkins
dissented, saying “what ifs” weren’t a good enough reason to deny a
request. He said “time was money” and the club owners should not have
to waste more of either to come back to another meeting.
Planning Commission Chair and City Council candidate Katrina Foley
disagreed.
“If we don’t give him the opportunity to buttress his arguments,
he may be wasting even more money,” Foley said.
The upscale club proposed for the basement portion of 1901 Newport
-- the Spanish-style building that sits across from Triangle Square
in the heart of downtown Costa Mesa -- would be about 11,000 square
feet and contain a dance floor, three bars and distinct lounge areas
surrounded by a typical nightclub setting. It is designed to
entertain about 800 people between the hours of 5 p.m. and 2 a.m.
Monday through Friday and 11 a.m. to 2 a.m. Saturday and Sunday.
The existing loading dock for the lower portion of the building
would be converted into an entrance, with an outdoor lounge area and
12 tables.
City planners recommended denying the nightclub proposal because
other area nightclubs have created substantial noise and trash
problems for surrounding residents. Officials were also concerned
about the concentration of liquor licenses around 19th Street and
Newport Boulevard.
The Yard House and Goat Hill Tavern, both popular bars, are across
the street from 1901 Newport, with one at Triangle Square and the
other just down Newport Boulevard, respectively.
Nightclub representatives refuted planning staff’s argument that
there are too many liquor licenses in the direct vicinity to
accommodate another. Raven said it was only logical to have bars and
nightclubs grouped together.
“Where else would you expect to find entertainment but Downtown?”
Raven asked.
Perkins addressed the issue of adequate security, especially in a
venue where alcohol is readily available.
Raven said security is largely based on the customers’ moods. It
is important to keep the clients happy, he said.
“Our patrons are happy and affluent,” Raven said.
When problems do arise, it is usually something nightclub
officials have no control over, such as a man seeing his
ex-girlfriend with another guy, Raven said. But even when those
conflicts arise, a team of well-trained security guards are on hand
to handle it.
Willa Bouwens-Killeen, the lead city planner on the project, said
the city was most concerned about the noise outside and how it might
bother the nearby homes.
“Even a car door slamming at 2 a.m. is noisy,” Bouwens-Killeen
said.
As a result, planning commissioners demanded a detailed parking
plan for the outdoor lots, which are closest to the residential area.
They also wanted specific valet parking designs and an agreement for
shared parking from neighboring businesses that also have nighttime
events, such as The Turnip Rose.
* LOLITA HARPER covers Costa Mesa. She may be reached at (949)
574-4275 or by e-mail at [email protected].
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.