Budget is a disgrace, cuts not...
Budget is a disgrace, cuts not necessary
The budget the city just passed was a sad commentary of government
at its worst. City Administrator Ray Silver led the City Council by
the nose from beginning to end. He set a tone of desperation from the
get-go by proposing to eliminate the Shipley Nature Center, the Drug
Abuse Resistance Education and the self-sufficiency program. Not once
did any of the council members look at some obvious places to cut the
budget such as information systems, outside consulting or
administration services. The budget for all these areas increased --
information systems more than 150%. I would have liked to hear
someone on the council suggest employees take a cut or even a freeze
on their salary increases and benefits. Instead, the council set out
to increase fees and wasted even more of our money paying an outside
consultant to do a fee study. Hopefully, with four new faces on the
council we might get someone that questions the staff’s agenda, which
seems to be city employees first, nature second and taxpayers last.
CLEM DOMINGUEZ
Huntington Beach
DARE proven to waste taxpayer money
The Independent has on several occasions reported about the
Huntington Beach City Council saving core funding for the Drug Abuse
Resistance Education program. Did the City Council stop to evaluate
if DARE works? Study after study, with test and control groups across
the country, has come to the same conclusion: DARE has no appreciable
impact on drug use or drug abstinence.
The well-meaning Celia Jaffe discusses in her letter to the
Independent (Mailbag, Sept. 26) what a wonderful thing the City
Council did by maintaining DARE funding. DARE is an expensive
feel-good program and a marketing tool for local police. Beyond its
pull on our heart-strings, DARE is proven to have no sustained impact
on children’s choices about drugs. Peer groups, preferences and
family are what matters in the choices a child makes.
The only identifiable impact of DARE is that it succeeds in taking
highly trained peace officers off the street-beat and into schools
and it diverts student attention from academics to DARE pep-rallies.
When drug use in our community is down, DARE takes credit. But when
drug use is up, the folks at DARE are strangely silent. Its time we
set aside our emotions and made informed choices about the
discretionary programs the City Council supports.
Drugs are a scourge on many societies, but red ribbons and cute
assemblies are an ineffective means of addressing the issue. Why
don’t we substitute a proven program for DARE ... parenting.
ROBERT SMYTHE
Huntington Beach
Council did a good job trimming budget
I work in Huntington Beach and I have two of my sons that live in
Huntington Beach and I’d like to say that I’m very proud that the
City Council was able to trim the budget. I think that it shows a
high level of responsibility to the residents of Huntington Beach. My
private industry, when you don’t have the revenue, you have to make
tough decision. In our case we laid off people, some people that had
14 years of seniority. You have to make those decisions. Make no
mistake, I am sorry that some of the programs like Drug Abuse
Resistance Education program and the Shipley Nature Center are not
going to be funded the way we’d like, but I am very proud of the City
Council and the fact that they stood up and made some very, very hard
decisions.
ROBIN GLEDHILL
Shocking images on trucks gone too far
This morning I was on my way to work on Goldenwest Street and
Edinger Avenue. I was at the light contemplating my day. I am
shocked, I am outraged, I am ticked off. On two trucks roaming around
Surf City are pictures of people being “Fried in an oven during the
war, an aborted fetus and Hiroshima.” This has gone way too far. What
are you supposed to say to very young children that are in your car?
I understand free speech, I understand the issue with the banners.
I understand pro-choice and pro-life. I am outraged because
whoever is promoting these horrible acts is putting parents in the
position to explain issues that maybe their children aren’t ready to
understand just yet. I wouldn’t be surprised if companies are going
to plaster on the side of the trucks murder scenes regarding gun
safety. There are many situations that could be on the sides of these
trucks, but shoving them down our throats is not the way to get your
point across.
I contacted the HRH and the response was that it is a statement
issue. Hiding behind the 1st Amendment is chicken. If you want to
protest, there are ways to silent protest without getting into
people’s faces and upsetting their children.
So to this company that has these trucks -- thanks for telling me
how to raise my children. Thanks for giving me insight to teach my
children values and morals. I didn’t know you didn’t trust my
judgment. Thanks for putting me in a position that maybe my children
weren’t ready to see.
I didn’t know I was raising my children with you. I don’t remember
you supporting me emotionally and financially all these years that
you had a say in what my children can see shoved in their faces.
DENYSE SCARBERRY
Huntington Beach
Voters should pass Proposition 50
Definitely, we need to save a little bit of the land that’s around
Huntington Beach and definitely the wetlands -- all of them. We have
enough development in town now. We’re overdeveloped and the schools
are overcrowded.
CAROLYN BEAL
Huntington Beach
I just think that if there’s any possibility that there would be
money for the Bolsa Chica Mesa to be bought it would have long term
benefits for the people, the wildlife -- everybody. People that don’t
even live here would be benefited by that.
JUNE NYE
Huntington Beach
How could we not pass Proposition 50? Preserving the mesa is just
vital, not only for our immediate Huntington Beach area but for all
of California. School children go there to learn biological history
of this whole area. It would be just terrible to have homes up there.
MARGE ALLEN
Huntington Beach
Proposition 50 smells fishy to me
Let me get this straight. Lucy Dunn of Hearthside Homes wants to
build homes on the Bolsa Chica Mesa (county land), but the Bolsa
Chica Land Trust and associates do not want Dunn to do this. They
want to purchase this land and create an artificial wetland so they
can pursue their bird-watching hobby. The bird-watchers do not have
the money to satisfy the amount this land is worth and Dunn cannot
build because the bird-watchers have a strong lobby that has control
of the California Coastal Commission’s appointees, who will not
approve any building on this county land.
Ergo, we have an impasse, so Dunn and the bird-watchers say, “Hey,
why not make the taxpayers buy this land at the asking price and Dunn
can go to the bank and we can have our artificial wetland and watch
the birds”. Both parties jump with glee and compose an initiative,
Proposition 50, to put on the ballot. Their thoughts are, “Surely the
voters will not vote against the birds. We all like birds, and
Proposition 50 will slide right on to a victorious conclusion.”
Do you get the feeling that the Artful Dodger and Fagan have been
resurrected and have our wallets as a target? How can these two
parties of a collusion put this Proposition 50 on the ballot and keep
from laughing? From now on I am going to resort to the old adage of
“voting the old rascals out before voting the new rascals in.”
Remember, the state cannot buy anything. The only money the state
has to purchase land is our tax money. I do not think Proposition 50
has a clean skirt. One more sour note, this artificial wetland is to
be the recipient of flood control waters from the Garden Grove area
and is conceded even by the bird-watchers to contain bacteria, heavy
metals and other pollution. Do our schemers intend for this pollution
to percolate into our aquifers? If not, is it intended to allow the
polluted water to find its way to our shore through their man-made
channel? What happens to the birds that find this polluted water
attractive? As long as the birds have the Bolsa Chica groupies as
friends, they sure do not need any enemies. The same goes for those
of us that depend on our fresh water aquifers to remain clean, our
well water drinkable and our beaches free from polluted urban runoff.
Are these special interest groups going to hoist this farce on the
people of California, or will the majority rule at the voting booth?
BOB POLKOW
Huntington Beach
McGrath carrying on legacy would be good
In answer to Dean Albright’s letter “McGrath would carry on Hutton
loss legacy,” Albright does not even seem “half-bright” on this
issue. The voters of this city continuously elected Gail Hutton as
our city attorney. That means that “we the people” are satisfied with
her direction. Now that she has retired, we have the responsibility
to find someone who will continue to represent our community. The
reason that this position is elected and not governed by the City
Council or city staff is to protect the citizens of this community.
McGrath has had the opportunity to practice municipal law as it
pertains to our cities needs. True, the law does not always give us
what we want, but we have to maintain the ability to interpret it
consistently, and not bend it to our will.
I think we would do well to maintain experience in the City
Attorney’s Office and not an unproven litigator that has to hire the
“big guns” of Scott Baugh to fight the word “for” on a candidates
signs. The McGrath signs are no different from any other candidate
that is currently running for local or state government. I am sure
that had McGrath known this would have been a problem she would have
avoided the situation and her signs would have read “Jennifer McGrath
for City Attorney.”
DAWN STANTON
Huntington Beach
Let’s support the Strand project
As a retailer I support the project. The prime area Downtown is a
wasteland until we develop it. Parking for employees should be
defined and then all systems should be ready to go. As soon as
possible.
MAUREEN SLOAN JAMES
Huntington Beach
Strand would kill the charm of Surf City
I am completely and totally against the Strand. Our city is
completely and totally overdeveloped and the last thing we need is
another hotel. You can’t fill up the Waterfront Hilton; how are you
going to fill up the Hyatt with 500 rooms and another hotel. We are
not Long Beach. We are a small surf city. It had its charm at one
time and it certainly doesn’t anymore because the development in this
city is rampant. They’re not going to be happy until every single
open space has something on it. Goldenwest Street has become a
residential Beach Boulevard because there’s so much traffic. The
quality of life in this city has gone down the tubes, in the last
five years in particular. I am just so unhappy with what has gone on
in this city and I am a long-time resident. I used to come down here
as a kid in the 1930s on the old Pacific Electric Red Car, so I know
a lot about Huntington Beach. I am completely and totally against the
Strand and I hope we keep our city the way it is.
CONNIE TUTTLE
Huntington Beach
I would say don’t approve this Strand project. It’s 400-some
parking spaces short. Maybe you could give or take a few, but not
that many, and guess whose neighborhoods they park in. They never
allow employees to park in their parking lot. Why would anybody
approve a project that’s penciling failure for a project to have no
parking.
LORETTA WOLFE
Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach: a noisy place to live
V. Barrett needs to know there are many of us B.F. Schnel whiners
in Huntington Beach who prefer a quieter environment. You incorrectly
state, “These helicopters are responding to some emergency.” For 10
hours a day and five night hours they are solely patrolling. Add an
emergency and if they’re not already patrolling, up they go again --
usually one, occasionally two. I respect the Police Department’s
mission and would rather a quieter less invasive form of delivery. If
one helicopter was used solely for emergencies, terrific. They’re a
big expense and an accident waiting to happen as patrol vehicles.
Fountain Valley calls itself a nice place to live. Huntington Beach
should call itself a noisy place to live. We can make decisions to
the contrary starting with eliminating helicopter patrol.
SUE DOMINGUEZ
Huntington Beach
Airplane advertising ban a waste of time
I think it’s absolutely stupid of the City Council to spend time
voting on something like this when there’s more important things to
do. What does it bother anybody to see a sign in the sky. I think
they’re just wasting time on frivolous things and they should be
taking care of more important things.
MAUREEN NEWMAN
Huntington Beach
Ban of planes a good call for City Council
I support the City Council’s right to ban planes towing ads from
flying over our city. I would just like to express my extreme,
extreme displeasure over these airplanes that fly over my house
constantly disturbing the peace that I so much long for in Huntington
Beach. I happen to be a private pilot myself and I think that this
gentleman who runs this company, Mr. Dobry, and the FAA should fall
in line with the citizens’ request to stop the noise pollution. Every
single neighbor and surfing buddy of mine and retailer in the area,
along with our local residents, are fed up with the noise pollution.
Fed up. So if I could do anything to support the City Council’s
decision and stop the noise pollution I would be glad to participate
on any level.
JOHN PARONE
Huntington Beach
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.