Some questions still need to be asked at forums
Geoff West
Eager to view the performances of Costa Mesa City Council
candidates first hand, my wife and I left the chaos and clutter of
our mid-remodel living room for the plush appointments of the
Community Center Thursday night and were amazed at the turnout (“No
knockouts in Costa Mesa debate,” Saturday).
Despite the fact that most of the activists in town were scheduled
to attend the Community Redevelopment Action Committee
“facilitation,” scheduled simultaneously under the same roof, the
turnout was much larger than anticipated -- so much so that the walls
had to be moved back to accommodate the throng.
In addition to the five candidates -- who worked the crowd before,
during and after the forum -- the gathering was also attended by
candidates for judgeships and positions on the Newport-Mesa Unified
school board and sanitary district. Of course, there were also local
politicians from years past basking in the afterglow, including the
moderator of the forum, former mayor Peter Buffa. His ex-ness was in
fine form and did a terrific job of posing the questions and keeping
the dialogue moving, the answers short and the tone of the evening
light and friendly.
During the nearly two hours on the dais, each candidate had the
opportunity to answer, or not answer, each question submitted by the
audience and presented by the moderator. Answers ranged from clearly
thought-out, articulate responses to garbled mutterings or no comment
at all. There were few surprises, but quite a few chuckles. We
learned, for example, that Mayor Linda Dixon is against prostitution
on Harbor Boulevard and that she continues to be more than willing to
publicly pat herself on the back for her role in the potential Davis
Elementary School skate park.
We learned that they all oppose bridges at the ends of 19th Street
and Gisler Avenue, and that they all support at least one skate park
in the city. We also learned that they have different ideas of the
priorities facing the city, with a skate park being high on a couple
lists. Among the questions that didn’t get asked this time around
were:
What plans do the candidates have for improving the representation
of the Latino community on the Westside?
This is important because, although the forum took place on the
Westside at the edge of a rapidly growing Latino population, I saw
not a single Latino face in the crowd.
Another that was not asked:
Our municipal oxymoron, Triangle Square, has never lived up to its
potential and appears to be on the verge of becoming a blight on the
city. Since it was created by the actions of the redevelopment agency
-- the City Council in a fancy dress -- what is your position on
similar redevelopment efforts in the city?
Additionally, questions for specific candidates were not
addressed. For example:
For Katrina Foley:
Recently you have been described as a clone of Dixon. If you
disagree with this characterization, how do you differentiate your
candidacy from hers? Why should voters consider you rather than the
mayor?
For Dixon:
Despite your long record of public service, your leadership has
come into question in recent months. What changes, if any, do you
plan to improve the perception of your effectiveness as a leader for
the city?
For Gary Monahan:
A question was recently raised about the possibility that your
reelection to a third term on the council will qualify you for a
pension -- a fact that has since been confirmed by city officials.
What plans do you have for this windfall, estimated to be a whopping
$100 per month if taken at age 55?
For Allan Mansoor:
It has been said that many of the same people who supported
Councilman Chris Steel and helped get him elected two years ago are
also active in your campaign. How do you feel about the tactics used
to get Steel elected, and will you encourage similar tactics in your
campaign?
For Bill Perkins:
In light of the brevity of your public service experience, what
specific ideas, skills or accomplishments do you feel particularly
qualify you for a position on the City Council at this time?
Perhaps these questions will be asked and answered at future
events. I’m sure some voters were enlightened Thursday night.
Hopefully, others who did not attend this forum will watch the
replays that will be shown on Channel 74 for the next few weeks.
There are three more of these events scheduled between now and the
Nov. 5 election, including the finale to be held in the council
chambers on Oct. 30. I encourage every voter to try to attend one or
more of them, or watch these candidates perform on TV, before the
election. The future of this city depends on strong, dedicated,
clear-minded, effective leadership. The question is, which of these
candidates can provide it?
* GEOFF WEST is an Eastside resident.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.