Austin bores, ‘Tadpole’ scores, ‘K-19’ snores
Film more ‘Oh, behave’ than ‘Groovy, baby’
The International Man of Mystery is back again. Without having
seen the original Austin Powers movie and its sequel, I only had the
previews for encouragement to see the newest film in the series,
“Austin Powers in Goldmember.” I was very curious to see what all the
hype was about and if the humor could sustain Mike Myers for another
installment.
“Goldmember” wasn’t all I hoped it would be. The characters and
plot were all very clear, but they tried to stretch the film too far.
I found something that can thwart Austin Powers: depth.
When “Goldmember” spends too much time on conflict, the movie
falls apart. Austin and Dr. Evil manage to put it back together
enough to limp to the end, but the film loses something vital. I was
bored -- big yawn. And it was very disheartening.
“Goldmember” starts out well. The cameos are fabulous. They’re
heavy at the beginning of the movie, and I won’t be the one to spoil
the fun and tell who pops up. And as a wonderful bonus, Britney
Spears is not in the movie as much as I had feared -- and she gets
dispatched in a vastly amusing way.
Mike Myers has his hands full and does an excellent job of keeping
all the characters balanced. Beyonce Knowles as Foxy Cleopatra is
upbeat, bouncy and full of power. Austin Powers should thank his
lucky stars he had her around.
Michael Caine is properly annoying as Austin’s father, Nigel. It’s
good he’s not in the film all that much. Fred Savage does an
excellent job of being a mere vehicle for a large mole on his face.
“Austin Powers in Goldmember” is funny and goofy for the most
part, but it has deep holes that were very boring. “Goldmember” hits
its high note early and never quite makes it back up the hill again.
It’s a good romp for a while but should have been much shorter.
Unfortunately, it would be better to see “Goldmember” with a
fast-forward button than on the big screen. “Goldmember” is, sadly,
more “Oh, behave!” than “Groovy, baby!”
“Austin Powers in Goldmember” is rated PG-13 for sexual innuendo,
crude humor and language.
* MELISSA RICHARDSON is a Costa Mesa resident and attends UC
Irvine.
‘Tadpole’ themes swim against the mainstream
“Tadpole” is a small, funny, coming-of-age movie. It isn’t a
masterpiece, but it is a decent effort at a witty, character-driven,
independent film.
Oscar “Tadpole” Grubman (Aaron Stanford) is not a typical
15-year-old American boy in most respects. He speaks French fluently,
enjoys discussing philosophy and has a passion for Voltaire. He is
uninterested in girls his own age, claiming they haven’t lived enough
to have any experience.
Oscar goes home to New York from prep school to spend Thanksgiving
with his father (John Ritter) and stepmother (Sigourney Weaver).
During this visit, he plans to reveal his feelings of love to the
object of his affections. But his visit home ends up being far more
complicated than either he or his family expected.
Oscar thinks he is mature and sophisticated beyond other people of
his own age. He is more comfortable with people who are almost three
decades older than himself, like his father, stepmother and their
circle of friends. But it is precisely his interactions with these
older people on this visit that finally teach Oscar that he is an
inexperienced teen who still has quite a bit of maturing to do after
all.
The best feature of “Tadpole” is the wonderful acting of the whole
cast. Stanford, who is actually in his 20s, is fully believable as a
15-year-old. Weaver and Ritter bring the right mix of intelligence
and warmth to their roles. As the stepmother’s best friend, Bebe
Neuwirth is vibrant and humorously amoral.
There are some problems in the story. It seems as though some
scenes that should be there are missing. And sometimes some of the
characters behave in ways that just don’t seem entirely believable.
These issues don’t detract, however, from enjoying the witty dialogue
delivered by talented actors.
If you are tired of the summer blockbusters and want to see a
movie that spends time developing interesting characters, “Tadpole”
might be the film for you.
“Tadpole” is rated PG-13 for sexual content, mature thematic
elements and language.
* TRICIA BEHLE lives in Newport Beach and works as a software
validator.
Even with Ford and Neeson, ‘K-19’ sinks
The crew of the K-19 Soviet submarine was sworn to secrecy after
the ill-fated maiden voyage that cost 21 lives and almost turned into
a nuclear disaster. Unfortunately, the cast and crew of the movie
“K-19: The Widowmaker” took no such oath and brought one of the
dullest maritime movies in recent memory to the big screen.
As a general rule, I tend to stay away from movies based on a true
story for just that reason. But with the recent group of successful
military movies -- “U-571” and “Black Hawk Down” -- “K-19” advertised
itself as being another exciting movie about submarines and a nearly
averted nuclear war. It may sound exciting, but as I’ve learned over
the years, trailers tend to be misleading.
The story is about Capt. Mikhail Polenin (Liam Neeson), who sees
his crew as a family and takes every precaution to ensure their
safety. It’s 1961, and the Soviet Union, in the middle of an arms
race with the United States, cares only about getting its nuclear
submarine out to sea so the Americans will think that it is still
equal in military power. The government considers Polenin’s behavior
to be weak.
To make sure that the half-finished submarine leaves dry-dock on
time and that the sea tests progress regardless of any safety issues,
they bring in Capt. Alexei Vostrikov (Harrison Ford) to take command
of the ship.
With two captains on board and Vostrikov being extremely strict
and running the crew through constant drills, it causes a lot of
tension and split loyalties for the crew. Things are made worse as
the new captain continues to push the submarine beyond the limits of
safety and sanity. The entire movie you are waiting for some kind of
confrontation between the two captains that never comes.
The most interesting part of the movie occurs toward the end, when
one of the on-board nuclear reactors breaks down and they have no way
to cool the core temperature. Members of the crew end up volunteering
to go into the reactor core and physically repair the damage. Armed
with chemical suits instead of radiation suits and going in pairs,
the men sacrifice their lives to save the lives of their fellow crew
members.
While the men are brave and heroic for willingly sacrificing their
lives, it makes for an incredibly dull movie unless you are
interested in watching the submarine drills and equipment repairs
that take up most of the film.
The movie has no exciting moments and just plods along with no new
interesting visuals or any great dialogue. The two veteran actors,
Ford and Neeson, do not contribute to the movie with any shows of
acting prowess. Their Russian accents are barely noticeable and seem
to come and go at will.
The most compelling thing about the movie is when you think about
the concept in today’s world. It’s scary to know how the Soviet Union
mishandled nuclear energy with everything that they knew.
“K-19: The Widowmaker” is rated PG-13 for disturbing images.
* TODD KARELLA is an intern at the Daily Pilot.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.