Mailbag - Feb. 28, 2002
- Share via
Let’s go back to praying
I certainly think that we should go back to the way we were and offer
a prayer before the City Council meeting starts.
CAROLYN NIEFELDT
Huntington Beach
Keep the cats inside, leave coyotes alone
Regarding the Feb. 21 article, “Coyotes plague Bolsa neighbors” -- We
are blessed to live in an area with some of Mother Nature’s most
extraordinary habitats. With that privilegecomes the responsibility of
taking care of these beautiful and fragile places.
The Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve is an endangered habitat in today’s
overdeveloped world. It is home to hundreds of species of birds, mammals
and aquatic life -- some endangered and threatened with extinction.
Coyotes serve a very important role at Bolsa Chica by helping to keep
the most dangerous predator of birds, cats, at bey.
Cats kill millions of wild birds each year according to a University
of Wisconsin study. It is simply common sense that responsible pet owners
who live near wildlife preserves should keep their pets safe in their
homes. And by doing so, they are also protecting the wildlife. It is a
small price to pay in exchange for living so close to a natural
wonderland. In fact, the Humane Society and the American Bird Conservancy
both urge cat owners to keep their cats indoors for longer and healthier
lives.
As for dog owners, please read the signs: dogs and bicycles are not
allowed on the ecological reserve. They are highly disruptive to the
wildlife. We all should be good neighbors and do our part to preserve our
rare and valuable wetlands resource.
MARINKA HORACK
Huntington Beach
Nothing should be done about the coyotes except enjoy their presence.
The dilemma is with people. If you live in an area where wild animals
inhabit guess what you get? Wild animals live where their food supply is,
including coyotes. People are going to have to start living with nature.
If you don’t want your car, dog, rabbit or hamster to become lunch for a
coyote keep them in the house or garage. Coyotes main food supply is
rats, mice and carrion.
Coyotes are a major part of our natural environment in Southern
California and do us a great service. As for the coyote’s yapping at
night, I have to put up with the neighbor’s dogs barking at all hours.
Isn’t it time we accept the fact that they are here to stay and enjoy
them?
MIKE SHRUBSOLE
Huntington Beach
Hike those development fees
I’m in agreement that the city should increase development fees to
assure we have proper infrastructure and parks and amenities that go
along with it. If they don’t want to build with the added fees, just let
them go someplace else and build.
CURTIS STELLEY
Huntington Beach
Yes, I think the city should increase developer fees. I don’t think we
can take care of what we already have and I don’t think growth is
especially a good thing.
DIANE STELLEY
Huntington Beach
It should come to no one’s surprise that the percentage of Orange
County households that can afford the median price county home, $303,000,
has declined from 40% to below 30% during the period of 1995 to 2001. Not
only is the number of houses insufficient for the demand, the McMansions
(biggest possible single family house on a lot) eat up all the available
land and serve the minimum number of residents. The people who run our
city know this problem well.
The city should do nothing to give developers yet another excuse for
building housing stock that the majority of us will never be able to
afford. If the city does anything to change the existing fee structure,
it should establish graduated fees that could act as incentives for the
development of affordable housing.
A graduated fee schedule combined with a site specific value
appraisal, might provide enough developer profit margin so that we could
see some affordable housing built. This approach will have minimum
negative impacts on property sold in the seven-figure range. I hope all
who are looking at this issue keep the overwhelming majority of citizens
in mind when they determine the formula.
JEFF LEBOW
Huntington Beach
Don’t raise fees at the cost of affordable housing
My answer is no, to the question, should the city increase development
fees at the expense of affordable housing. no.
JIM GOSNEYHuntington Beach
I’m calling about the fee raising and I’m against it.
LINDA GILKEYHuntington Beach
I do not want the developers to get hit with a larger tax and curtail
affordable housing.
WALTER KONEIG
Huntington Beach
I have always voted for the school bonds (which never seem to pass)
But this year I’m not too sure. The information I received in the mail
asking for a yes vote was endorsed by a lot of people I do not know
because I’m not into politics. But I have a problem as to why Loretta
Sanchez endorsed this, she is a representative for the 46th District
(Garden Grove) not Huntington Beach. Also, Huntington Seacliff was built
in 1999 and looks like a new and nice school -- they want $188,000. to
increase playground. I agree this may be important, but how about the
other schools that are crumbling to the ground.
CAROL BYRNE
Huntington Beach
There are some people who are opposed to any tax increases no matter
what the size or purpose of the proposed increase may be. Some of those
people may oppose Measure DD on the March 5 ballot, which proposes a
school bond measure to upgrade the aging facilities of the Huntington
Beach City School District.
But the entire public school system is funded by taxes and it is
important to consider when those schools may need a small boost to
improve the quality of our children’s education. Measure DD calls for
only a very small increase in taxes.
Of the seven school bond measures on the ballot throughout Orange
County, the Huntington Beach measure only seeks a total of $30 million,
while the other six range from $50 million to $240 million. The proposed
tax rate for the other six measures ranges from $18.41 up to $32.50 per
$100,000 of assessed valuation.
The Huntington Beach measure is only $16 per $100,000. On a typical
Huntington Beach home assessed at about $300,000, that translates into an
increase of $48 dollars a year.
And that’s tax-deductible from your state and federal income taxes.
Meaning that most of us who own homes will have a net cost less than $40
a year.
In the context that the tax rate for most of us is around $1,000 per
$100,000 of assessed valuation, the tax increase is only about 1.6%.
Considering that the district has carefully planned its proposal, this
small judiciously sized tax increase is well worth it in what it can do
for our children. Vote yes on DD.
ROSEMARY SAYLOR
Huntington Beach
I am a 34-year homeowner in Huntington Beach. My children went to
elementary and high school here, and now my grandchildren have begun
their educational journey. As a parent, I am so grateful to the
generation before me that had the foresight and vision to understand that
the quality of life in this community is related to the quality of our
schools. They were willing toreach into their pockets to build the
facilities that I have taken for granted all these years -- wonderful
places where my children thrived and matured.
But as wonderful as our schools are, the sad fact is that they are
just plain old and in need of repair and modernization. These schools
serve our children and youth well. Our students perform well on
standardized assessments and most of the schools have been identified by
the State of California as “Distinguished.” We need to make sure our
schools will continue to serve future generations by bringing these
facilities up to current codes and standards. Measure DD will do just
that.
LYN SCOTT
Huntington Beach
The opposition to the school bond measure on the March 5 ballot claims
that if the Huntington Beach City School District had submitted its
applications at least a year earlier in order to access nearly $17
million in matching state funds for modernization, we would have those
funds now. What nonsense. In order to be eligible for these state funds
the district must be able to come up with a 20% match.
That’s a big part of the reason this bond measure is being submitted
to the voters -- the district doesn’t have $4 million in matching funds.
If approved, Measure DD will provide these matching funds.
The truth is, the district could have submitted its applications one
year ago or even two years ago -- but without the required matching funds
in the bank it is not eligible to receive state modernization funds.
Our schools have done a good job, but now they need our help. A
successful bond measure will make certain that classrooms are repaired
and upgraded, improve student access to technology, repair roofs, replace
obsolete heating systems and ensure safety systems are brought up to
current standards. We need Measure DD to access matching state funds.
DUANE DISHNOHuntington Beach
Editor’s Note: Duane Dishno is the former superintendent of the
Huntington Beach City School District.
The Huntington Beach City School District has placed Measure DD on the
March ballot. This measure proposes to raise some $30 million (plus up to
$17 million in state aid when available) to renovate, upgrade and improve
the district’s schools.
I am surprised to hear the opponents of the measure argue that the
school district ought to sell its closed school sites in order to raise
this money. But the sale of these sites would also mean the loss of the
playing fields and open spaces on these sites, which the residents now
enjoy.
The school district has acted responsibly in leasing these sites on a
long-term basis to educational enterprises. That means that the district
actually gets more money in the long run than if they sold the sites. But
it also means that the open recreational spaces are preserved for the use
of our youth sports teams rather than the building of a Wal-Mart or
housing or some other use creating more congestion and less recreation in
our community. AYSO Region 56 has 1,600 registered players in its
program. The impact to our program alone if these sites were sold would
be devastating.
The passage of the bond -- especially since it is such a small
increment to our taxes -- is the responsible way to bring our schools up
to date. I urge all those associated with our youth sports and other
recreational interests to support measure DD. We do not need to lose any
of the scarce open spaces in Huntington Beach.
CATHERINE D. WHITE
Regional Commissioner
AYSO Region 56
County doesn’t need a great park
Due to the severe local impacts that would occur from Measure W, our
neighboring city councils of Newport Beach, Costa Mesa, Westminster and
Seal Beach have all passed resolutions opposing it. Putting a pricey park
on an Environmental Protection Agency superfund site will not magically
decrease flight demand. If El Toro isn’t used as an airport, then nearby
John Wayne, Long Beach and/or Los Alamitos will instead have to expand.
In 2006, the caps and curfews will expire at John Wayne. The FAA and the
Air Transport Assn. will oppose any extension of the previous settlement
agreement if El Toro is not used. At Long Beach, they once had a cap of
15 daily flights. But, the airlines sued in federal court and the cap
nearly tripled to 41 flights. History could repeat itself, if W passes.
By the way, the fine for any airline violating curfew is a mere $300.
Here is how Irvine feels: Councilman Mike Ward in a letter to the Orange
County Board of Supervisors:’ ‘Long Beach Airport is operating below
capacity,” (It’s already the nation’s second busiest facility.) Irvine
Councilman Greg Smith in a letter to the Los Angeles Times on 06/21/98:
“Building a commercial airport at Los Alamitos is the perfect answer to
future air passenger and cargo needs. Takeoffs could be routed over the
open spaces of the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, minimizing noise and
pollution.” For who? Not us. Imagine that these so called great park
proponents would send jets over the National Wildlife Refuge located on
the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station. Gee, how environmentally friendly.
Also, in 1990 a Blue Ribbon commission was formed to find a second
Orange County airport. Among the upper third tier of choices for sites
was Bolsa Bay and Huntington Flats a.k.a. the Bolsa Chica wetlands and
offshore Huntington Beach.
The odds of either place being put to use greatly increase if W
passes. What’s scary is, if there were ever an election for these sites,
it could literally pit the entire county against Huntington Beach. If
that wasn’t enough of a threat to the Bolsa Chica, there’s initiative
language, which allows industrial and housing development to apply to all
unincorporated areas of the county. For the sake of our community’s
future, please vote no on Prop W.
REX RICKS
Huntington Beach
Three local measures deserve our support
Three local measures, FF, GG, and HH, deserve the support of the
residents of Huntington Beach. We all know how politicians love to retain
the discretion to spend our tax dollars as they please, often providing
us with the niceties and ignoring the necessities. To the credit of the
Huntington Beach City Council, they’ve placed measure FF on the ballot,
which ties their hands and mandates that at least 15% of the general fund
revenue must be placed in a infrastructure fund, with citizen oversight,
which can only be used for that purpose. That’s responsible government
and the measure deserves our support. Measure HH also merits a yes vote.
The only thing worse than taxes are inequitable taxes -- taxes that some
pay and others do not. That’s the case with the AES power plant on
Pacific Coast Highway. Every resident and business in Huntington Beach
pays a gas utility tax on all the gas they consume, regardless of whether
the purpose is wholesale or retail, except the AES power plant. Measure
HH is designed to remove that exemption and rectify the unfairness. The
voters should not be misled by the double-talk about a double tax. AES
doesn’t sell its energy to the residents of Huntington Beach, but sells
it to the grid, where it is sold to those outside our city. We suffer
100% of the impacts and receive none of the benefits. The people in
Fullerton, Yorba Linda, Orange, and other cities that enjoy the
electricity produced at our expense ought to pay for the impacts, not the
residents of Huntington Beach. Finally, Measure GG asks the voters
whether any money generated from requiring AES to pay a gas utility tax
on all the gas they consume, just like we do, should be spent on our
infrastructure. That is exactly where the money ought to be spent. These
three measures, Measures FF, GG, and HH, finally begin to address our
infrastructure problem by dedicating money to an infrastructure fund and
requiring AES to pay their fair share. That’s why I support a yes vote on
all three measures.
RON DAVIS
Huntington Beach
Measure EE is bad for us
Do multimillionaire mobile home rent gougers need government
protection? That’s what the Property Rights Initiative is all about. Do
the poor elderly in mobile home parks need protection or do the
multimillionaires need protection?
Four multimillionaire mobile home park owners got scared when the “ole
boys club” at the city hall began to crumble. Their guilty conscience
began to think, if the people for rent control for mobile homes get a
majority vote in November, we are going to lose our huge profit margins.
Elderly poor have seen rents in mobile home parks escalate1000%, from
$50 to $1,000 a month. Other parks are making a profit of over 100% of
their initial investment. How can you beat that? Here is how to do it.
We will confuse the people with a fake Property Rights Measure and
then throw in apartments so we will get all the real estate people to
support us.
Don’t be fooled by their lies. This measure has nothing to do with
property rights. Apartment renters are not organized and they haven’t
even thought of rent control.
What this so called Property Rights Measure calls for is government
protection for permanent, complete rent gouging for the widows and
elderly poor in mobile home parks that are taking a terrible beating
right now. This monopoly industry is asking for complete economic
dominance in mobile home parks
guaranteed by a city charter.
This monopoly agency does not need government protection to guarantee
their predatory pricing. They can raise prices to any level without this
ordinance. There is no rent control ordinance being considered by the
Huntington Beach city council.
Please vote no on Measure EE to save poor elderly in mobile home parks
and struggling young people from excessive rental escalation now and in
the future.
JOHN JANKOWSKI
Huntington Beach
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.