Taking a closer look at city’s infrastructure needs
Tariq Malik
HUNTINGTON BEACH -- The key to keeping the city’s infrastructure in
sound shape over the next two decades is, of course, money --- something
the city may need more of.
The city’s Infrastructure Planning Committee, a panel of city
officials and infrastructure-minded citizens, met with council members
last week to review funding policies for the integrated infrastructure
management program.
Resident Dick Harlow, the committee’s co-chairman, told council
members at a March 26 meeting that the city will need about $1.3 billion
to meet its infrastructure requirements over the next 20 years.
“We project there to be about $472 million in available funds for the
program, leaving a shortfall of $850 million,” he said, adding that the
city would have an annual need of about $40 million.
The city’s existing financial resources, such as revenue from taxes
and fees are insufficient to meet essential needs, committee members
said.
Outside grants, a review and update of city fees and charges, as well
as the enactment of a proposed sewer service charge are some of the
recommendations the committee suggested to raise additional money.
Other suggestions included putting a charter amendment on the March
2002 ballot that would, if passed, establish an infrastructure fund and
an oversight committee. A separate ballot item would propose a citywide
community facilities district that could supplement the city’s general
fund expenditures, while funding crucial non-sewer projects.
City officials said there is still more work to be done before the
suggested funding polices are presented to the council April 16.
Further study, for instance, is needed to determine how litigation
between the Howard Jarvis Tax Assn. and the city over a property tax
could affect the amount of general fund money available for
infrastructure purposes. Historically, the city has reserved about 15% of
the general fund for infrastructure needs.
“Our legacy is to ensure that Huntington Beach is a safe place to live
and preserve the quality of life,” said Councilwoman Shirley Dettloff, a
co-chair of the committee, “and what that is founded on is a pure
infrastructure.”
Harlow said the one money-saving idea is to focus on preserving
existing infrastructure systems, such as streets, because constant
attention would cost about one-seventh the price of a complete
refurbishment project.
“In the long run, it’s going to be money well-spent,” he added.
The city began a major review of its long-term infrastructure needs in
1995, and two years later, issued its integrated infrastructure
management program report, committee officials said. That report alerted
city officials to expected funding shortfalls.
Similarly, a group of 35 alternates have served on a citizens
infrastructure advisory committee to identify the city’s most important
needs and priorities in the area, as well as evaluating funding and other
financial methods.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.