REBUTTAL
- Share via
I ignored columnist Steve Smith’s earlier commentary on the upcoming
Newport-Mesa Unified School District bond issue and why he was choosing
not to lend it his support. I did so believing that, as the facts about
the conditions of our schools became known, he’d learn why this step is
so desperately needed by our community, and so inform your readers.
Smith’s tirade in last Saturday’s Pilot let me know how wrong I was to
let the first opportunity pass without a response (“Board: Accept
responsibility before we accept bond,” March 4).
Put succinctly, it appears he’s not going to support the bond issue until
the board accepts “responsibility for allowing our schools to fall into
such disrepair.” Even though he acknowledges the schools are in sorry
shape, and that his kids deserve improved educational facilities, and
that the value of his property would increase with the bond’s passage,
he’s against the measure because board members haven’t accepted
responsibility and issued a public o7 mea culpaf7 .
Unbelievable.
I’m a member of the district’s Citizens Budget Advisory Committee, as
well as the Facilities Advisory Committee. The board appointed me and a
number of other concerned citizens to help advise it on how to rebuild
our schools. Notice I said rebuild -- not repair.
Smith seems hung up on why the board hasn’t maintained our schools. What
I’ve learned over a year of meetings is that the members have, to the
maximum extent allowed by available (read discretionary) funding.
I learned that millions of dollars have been spent over the last few
years in maintenance and repair. Was it enough? No, because enough money
wasn’t -- and isn’t -- available, for all the reasons you don’t want to
hear about. But what the board couldn’t and didn’t do is rebuild.
Stop and think about it.
The youngest of our schools is more than 30 years old. Many are much
older. Their plumbing and wiring and heating / ventilation systems and
roofs and sidewalks and doors and windows are worn out or broken. No
amount of maintenance and repair can restore them. They need to be
rebuilt.
The folks of a generation or two before us paid to build these schools,
using a bond.
Isn’t it our turn to rebuild them for the generations to come using the
same sort of funding methodology? And then, under the watchful eyes of
independent disbursement and oversight committees, composed of the
appropriate professionals, we keep them in top-notch condition for
generations to come?
That’s exactly what’s planned.
Steve, I’ve satisfied myself that it’s not the board’s fault our 29
schools need us to step up and rebuild them. In fact, a group of
community members, many of whom were on the Facilities Advisory
Committee, are so dedicated to resolving the problem they’ve helped to
quantify that. They chose to form Citizens to Rebuild Our Schools, a
nonprofit organization, in an effort to do exactly that. You and the
community will hear from them during the coming weeks.
I trust you’ll choose to drop your prejudices and the need to place the
blame and exact retribution and take an objective look at this issue. If
you do, I’m sure you’ll come up with a different conclusion and begin to
support our collective efforts to give your kids, and all of our kids,
the schools they so richly deserve.
By the way, Steve, you were also a member of the Citizens Budget Advisory
Committee. Why is it I never saw you at any of our meetings?
CHUCK CASSITY
Costa Mesa
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.